Mark Squilla, a city councilman from Philadelphia, recently proposed a bill that would create a police-accessible registry of entertainers who sought to perform in the city’s venues, with the intent of allowing the police to vet acts and have a voice in whether they would be given licenses to perform. It seems the citizens of Philadelphia weren’t too pleased about this; while Squilla soon claimed that “…this provision is NOT intended to restrict artistic expression or any kind of entertainment, but rather is aimed at addressing public safety and quality of life issues,” opponents of the bill cited various concerns, most notably their belief that the bill would not actually protect the public, and that law enforcement should not be given such wide ranging powers. This sort of legislation, in fact, seems to me like the sort of thing that would result in police trying to keep even slightly controversial entertainers out of their city, or even ones they simply didn’t like if corruption was particularly rampant. If the bill passes in any form resembling its current one, it may create a great deal of difficulty for metal musicians seeking to perform for their fans in the area.
Tags: censorship, live shows, philadelphia, policework, surveillance
“this provision is NOT intended to restrict artistic expression”
No, no, of course not. Oh, by the way, hate is not an artistic expression, and anything that falls outside our narrow ideology is hate. :)
Welcome to North Korea.
Polka bands will finally have their chance to make a strong comeback.
That’s some communist dictatorship shit.
The agenda is clear. They are censoring dissent to the system.