The rise of a new medium catches everyone by surprise, especially those who are trying to make it succeed. In the case of video gaming, the medium existed for many years before it came to maturity with the full-featured video games of the late 1990s, spurred on by the massive success of first-person shooter Doom, itself a followup on the renovation of the classic 1980s video game Wolfenstein with Wolfenstein 3D. Then, for reasons unknown, someone made a movie based in the world of Doom, and… it was good.
At the point in time when Doom III, the most proximate inspiration for this movie, emerged, video games had transitioned into something like a film which required user engagement. With full plot lines, accessories for the characters (we might blame 1980s Star Wars figures for this), ability to use in-game utilities to uncover plot, and complex goals to hide the banality of constant machine gun warfare, the new games hybridized all of the successful tropes of video games of the previous decade with the gestures of action movies that succeeded. This gave them new complexity and made the transition to movie more challenging if the film hoped to differentiate itself from the game. Early efforts were often horrifyingly bad. Doom corrects this with a fast-paced, tight-edited movie that keeps the plot of the game at its center, and pays extensive tribute to the game without becoming a string of in-jokes. This film could be watched without any knowledge of the game and it would be as compelling, as it is in fact brainier and more compelling than the average action film.
Doom begins in California, where a team of Marines are heading out to Las Vegas, NV, where an interstellar portal that opens on Mars has been discovered. Borrowing this idea from Edgar Rice Burroughs, the film mixes in bits of Stargate, Aliens and Starship Troopers to show us a group of hard-fighting colonial marines sent on a mission with few specifics. They discover an outbreak of a zombie-like disease which turns out to be a genetic mutation. The wrinkle is that this mutation does not so much change people as reveal what they actually are, and this creates a layer of character depth to the movie which proves instrumental to its plot and steers around the worst of the endless waves of enemies effect that early first-person shooters demonstrated. That being said, this film is designed as an action movie for young men, and so it adheres to the requirements of pleasing that audience. The hammy Dwayne Johnson delivers his usual stern facial muscles and straining deltoids, but his performance is not as central to the movie as the posters might have you believe. Ultra-gruff cinematic violence expert Karl Urban plays opposite to alternatively plain and striking Rosamund Pike, with whom the filmmakers pander to anticipated audience taste by ensuring that her relatively reserved clothing reveals the outline of breasts and nipples in every scene. That is the pulp fiction nature of both video games and action movies, however, and Doom pulls it off by being good-natured but not obsessive. The characters are part of the scenery, albeit scenery that evolves with the plot. As the film progresses, the character drama takes over, and then in one of the most enjoyable breaks in film history, the movie goes into first-person shooter mode for a finale that pays full loving tribute to the original video game.
Perhaps Doom will never be mentioned in East End coffee klatches or fashion magazines, and it may never attract more than a small die-hard cult audience, but it can be appreciated for its renovation of an otherwise uptight sub-genre of film and its ability to make what might otherwise easily deviate into idiot territory into a thoughtful and suspenseful film. The violence of raw first-person shooters here distills, as in Aliens but with less emphasis on pure suspense, to a game of anticipation in which characters must react suddenly to unexpected threats while in the midst of confusion and incredulity as they discover what is going on. The result is part mystery, mostly action film, and part the oldest type of sci-fi which is the exploration of the human being as revealed by his technology, in this case genetic engineering and 21st century violence.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TtXFlzZa-QA
Tags: doom, first-person shooter, genetic engineering, karl urban, rosamund pike, video games
Watched it a few years ago and thought it was terrible. I might give it an extra shot having this review in mind.
Very interesting analysis. I’d not thought of this movie in such depth but I definitely enjoyed it. The scene that shows the hero with a chainsaw vs. the wheelchair monster encompasses both aspects of the best points of the movie that you mentioned, no?
Rock was one the greatest on the mic in pro-wrestling but what I’ve seen of his acting is pretty hammy. But it looks like you can definitely smell what is cooking in this film.
How is speed metal band OVERKILL perceived on this site ?
You have to review the drummer based movie Whiplash
The scripting and acting was absurd. Nobody could get away with treating students like the instructor did, no matter how good he supposedly was. The first time he called someone a faggot his ass would be toast. Obviously the movie was intended to be a drama but for me the ranting insults were comical and I had a good laugh. Talk about over-acting though.
Weird how the YouTube still and the cover of the movie have the same exact Rock pose.
The presence of Karl Urban makes me want to check this out. He was great in Dredd, which was one of the most metal movies of recent vintage.
I remember when this came out. I was in high school and making the transition into adulthood, and I never got around to seeing it. The first-person sections looked interesting in the trailer. I’m surprised that technique isn’t used more often outside of giallos and ’80s slashers.
Have you seen the Maniac remake?